Do you think it in any way shape or form reasonable to state that the mummies of Yuya, Thuya, Amunhotep III, Tiye, KV35YL, KV55, both KV21 mummies, Tutankhamun and the two foetuses found with him, are all "fake" in that not one of them is a royal or connected to the royal family, all to disgiuse the "true" location of Tutankhamun. You know, you sound just like maat, and also like "M" before him, the same contempt for commonsense and for proven fact. Do you see it? Do you see how impossible it is to be coincidental? Reality and common sense needs to be cast aside first. None of which actually happened - it's all just a story woven around astronomical observations?Īnd your evidence for this is the time intervals you've identified between selected eclipses that match the time intervals listed in (one version of) the biblical texts? And let's remind ourselves - you're not picky when it comes to choosing eclipses to match. As the years and centuries ticked by this story grew and grew into the 600 000+ words of the Old Testament. Rather than tell stories about the same few dozen gods they invented generation upon generation of flesh & blood people. Isn't that why they identified the planets - the wandering stars - as gods? And those gods had personalities, and fights, and they influenced or controlled us plebs, the weather, etc.īut you're saying that certain ancient peoples took this to the extreme - convinced there was only one god they had to create a narrative to explain all the other observations (even though they knew these followed measurable cycles). So it's possible they made up fanciful stories to explain the celestial dances they observed. I'm guessing humans have realised that for many thousands of years. The planets and stars follow predictable patterns. So how do you choose which ones are significant? Which ones fit your narrative and why are all the rest irrelevant? Eclipses _R _Us) there are approximately 2.5 solar eclipses per year and a similar number of lunar ones. The ones I've looked at only go back to 3000 BC - I guess there's little call for detailed knowledge of earlier events. So - here's my concern: there are many websites that catalogue eclipses. There's no date or annotation that I can decipher. They show an unlabelled x-axis, an unlabelled sinusoidal line, lots of stars, a handful of asterisms 1 out of literally 2 billions that could be drawn, and what I assume is a solar eclipse.
Isn't that the problem - we can't see the pattern(s)? Your images don't tell me anything useful.
Them/they? I stand alone, I only noticed a pattern that I am sharing here.